2020 SEP - Engaging in Argument from Evidence

Page history last edited by Heather Johnston 2 years, 9 months ago

Back to 3D Science Vertical Learning Progressions Homepage

Practice: Engaging in Argument from Evidence
Argumentation is the process by which evidence-based conclusions and solutions are reached. In science and engineering, reasoning and argument based on evidence are essential to identifying the best explanation for a natural phenomenon or the best solution to a design problem. Scientists and engineers use argumentation to listen to, compare, and evaluate competing ideas and methods based on merits. Scientists and engineers engage in argumentation when investigating a phenomenon, testing a design solution, resolving questions about measurements, building data models, and using evidence to evaluate claims.
Grades K-2	Grades 3-5	Grades 6-8	Grades 9-12
Engaging in argument from evidence in K-2 builds on prior experiences and progresses to comparing ideas and representations about the natural and designed world(s).	Engaging in argument from evidence in 3-5 builds on K-2 experiences and progresses to critiquing the scientific explanations or solutions proposed by peers by citing relevant evidence about the natural and designed world(s).	Engaging in argument from evidence in 6-8 builds on K-5 experiences and progresses to constructing a convincing argument that supports or refutes claims for either explanations or solutions about the natural and designed world(s).	Engaging in argument from evidence in 9-12 builds on K-8 experiences and progresses to using appropriate and sufficient evidence and scientific reasoning to defend and critique claims and explanations about the natural and designed world(s). Arguments may also come from current scientific or historical episodes in science.
Identify arguments that are supported by evidence. Distinguish between explanations that account for all gathered evidence and those that do not. Analyze why some evidence is relevant to a scientific question and some is not. Distinguish between opinions and evidence in one's own explanations.	Compare and refine arguments based on an evaluation of the evidence presented. Distinguish among facts, reasoned judgement based on research findings, and speculation in an explanation.	Compare and critique two arguments on the same topic and analyze whether they emphasize similar or different evidence and/or interpretations of facts.	Compare and evaluate competing arguments or design solutions in light of currently accepted explanations, new evidence, limitations (e.g., trade-offs), constraints, and ethical issues. Evaluate the claims, evidence, and/or reasoning behind currently accepted explanations or solutions to determine the merit of arguments. (CH.PS4.3, B.LS2.6, B.LS2.8, B.LS4.5, ES.ESS1.5, EN.LS2.6)
Listen actively to arguments to indicate agreement or disagreement based on evidence and/or to retell the main points on the argument.	Respectfully provide and receive critiques from peers about a proposed procedure, explanation or model by citing relevant evidence and posing specific questions.	Respectfully provide and receive critiques about one's explanations, procedures, models, and questions by citing relevant evidence and posing and responding to questions that elicit pertinent elaboration and detail.	Respectfully provide and/or receive critiques on scientific arguments by probing reasoning and evidence and challenging ideas and conclusions, responding thoughtfully to diverse perspectives, and determining what additional information is required to resolve contradictions.
Construct an argument with evidence to support a claim. (K.ESS2.2, 2.PS1.4)	Construct and/or support an argument with evidence, data, and/or a model. (3.LS2.1, 3.LS4.3, 4.LS1.1, 5.PS2.1, 5.LS1.1, 5.ESS1.1) Use data to evaluate claims about cause and effect.	Construct, use and/or present an oral and written argument supported by empirical evidence and scientific reasoning to support or refute an explanation or a model for a phenomenon or a solution to a problem. (6.LS1.3, 7.PS3.5, 7.LS2.4, 7.ESS3.4, 8.PS2.4, 8.LS1.4)	Construct, use, and/or present an oral and written argument or counter-arguments based on data and evidence. (PH.PS4.3, ES.ESS2.7, EN.ESS2.7)
Make a claim about the effectiveness of an object, tool, or solution that is supported by relevant evidence.	Make a claim about the merit of a solution to a problem by citing relevant evidence about how it meets the criteria and constraints of the problem (3.LS4.4, 3.ESS3.1)	Make an oral or written argument that supports or refutes the advertised performance of a device, process, or system, based on empirical evidence concerning whether or not the technology meets relevant criteria and constraints. Evaluate competing design solutions based on jointly developed and agreed-upon design criteria. (7.LS2.5)	Make and defend a claim based on evidence about the natural world or the effectiveness of a design solution that reflects scientific knowledge, and student-generated evidence. (B.LS3.2) Evaluate competing design solutions to a real-world problem based on scientific ideas and principles, empirical evidence, and/or logical arguments regarding relevant factors (e.g., economic, societal, environmental, ethical considerations). (ES.ESS3.2, EN.ESS3.2)